Clinical Resource

Achieving Accurate Impressions & Digital Scans

Precise capture of the preparation margin is the foundation of every successful restoration. Whether using traditional impression materials or digital intraoral scanners, the quality of the final result depends on tissue management, moisture control, and margin visibility.

Why You’re Here

If you’ve arrived at this page, chances are you’ve experienced one of these common challenges:

These issues almost always trace back to tissue management, retraction, and moisture control. The good news is that with the right approach, predictable accuracy is absolutely achievable.

What This Means for Your Practice

Every unclear margin leads to delays, remakes, and extra chair time. Patients lose confidence when they need to return for another appointment, and your team loses valuable production hours.

At Rohling Dental Laboratory, our goal is to help you reduce remakes, save chair time, and deliver predictable results. When margins are clear, restorations seat smoothly and patients leave happy.

Traditional ImpressionsDigital ScansPractical SolutionsHow We Partner With YouKey TakeawaysFAQ

Scan Examples: Good vs. Needs Attention

Use this gallery to compare clear, fully visible margins with scans that commonly trigger “margin unclear” notes. Replace the placeholder images and captions with your own screenshots and a brief narrative on what went right (or wrong) and how to correct it (e.g., dual-cord technique, additional retraction, hemostasis, or drying).

Clear supragingival margin with dry field and continuous finish line
Good: Clear, continuous margin; dry field; no soft tissue encroachment.
Dual-cord retraction with fully exposed subgingival margin, slight fluid control issue at the disto-lingual
Could be Improved: Dual-cord retraction exposing a subgingival margin; excellent visibility, with slight fluid control issue at the disto-lingual.
Margin partially obscured by tissue and crevicular fluid
Needs Attention: Margin partially obscured by tissue/fluid. Re-tract and achieve hemostasis before rescanning.
Pooling saliva causing glare and loss of detail at the finish line
Needs Attention: Pooling saliva and glare reduce detail. Dry thoroughly and re-scan the margin segment.

Traditional Impressions

Tissue Retraction: Adequate displacement of the gingiva is essential to expose the entire finish line. Retraction cord, hemostatic agents, or retraction pastes can be used to open the sulcus.

Hydraulic Compression Effect: When light-body VPS is syringed directly into the sulcus, it is hydraulically forced against the preparation, displacing fluid and capturing margin detail with remarkable accuracy.

Material Flow: High-quality impression materials are designed to flow into even the smallest crevices, ensuring crisp reproduction of line angles and subgingival detail.

Digital Scans

Line of Sight: Unlike impression materials, scanners cannot displace tissue or fluids. The margin must be fully visible to the scanner’s camera.

Tissue Retraction: Retraction must be even more precise than in traditional impressions. Both mechanical retraction (cord, paste, laser, or electrosurgery) and moisture control are essential.

No Hydraulic Compression: Digital scanners cannot replicate the hydraulic effect of VPS. If tissue or fluids obscure the margin, the scanner cannot capture it.

Practical Solutions You Can Apply Today

How We Partner With You

We’re more than a lab—we’re your partner in delivering excellent patient care.

Key Takeaways

Frequently Asked Questions

Are traditional impressions more accurate than digital scans?

Both can be highly accurate when protocols are followed. VPS benefits from hydraulic compression, while digital scans rely on full margin visibility through excellent retraction and moisture control.

Why do digital scanners miss subgingival margins?

Scanners cannot displace tissue or fluids; they rely on line-of-sight. If gingiva or fluid obscures the margin, it will not be captured—unlike VPS, which hydraulically expresses into the sulcus.